Where have all the affordances gone?

What’s worse than understanding a lot of crap on the screen? Memorizing a lot of crap that isn’t. Bring back affordances. The essence of the graphical user interface was not graphic design by graphic designers for graphic designers. It was to enable and empower users to interact with computers by way of visual representation of the functionality and the means to interact with it.

Why am I seeing a loss of affordances everywhere and a surge in reliance upon guesswork and memorization for successful interaction?  Affordances are of course, those cues built in to the design of things that offers me clues as to what it is and how I am to interact with it.  We depend on these things to get through the day.  More and more these things are aspects of software.  So, why are these things disappearing? Sigh. It’s a case of minimalists vs. simpletons.

Invisibility is an effect to be achieved when the user is put in touch with the subject matter to the extent that the user’s awareness of the UI itself fades.  This is a form of minimalism and is not a new idea.  I recall news anchor, Jim Lehrer weighing in on design in an article in ID magazine in the late 80s. He defined the best design as invisible, citing the example of the suit he is wearing on the News Hour not detracting from the subject matter of the news.  Obviously that idea is lost on this generation of news anchors, Robin Meade, Soledad O’Brien, or the Fox & Friends guys, etc.

A gross fallacy is to think that this effect of invisible design is achievable simply by removing anything visible of the UI.  That would be Simpleton design.

This new modernist movement contains all of the truth and fiction of previous ones.  Designers will play Jenga with design, removing pieces until it all comes crashing down, then start putting some pieces back until it is stable once again.  It is actually a pretty good exercise, but a painful one to put users through.

Einstein’s advice to “Make things as simple as possible, but not simpler” can be violated either of two ways. Trading one mistake for the other is not really much of an improvement.

- roger

On Hammers & Nails

A visionary is someone who understands the problem at a level of abstraction such that when a potential solution appears, he can spot how it might fit the need, even though it isn’t packaged in a box with a label that says, “Solution to the problem”.

Back when the web happened along, I happened to be studying ways to deliver large amounts of maintenance data to airlines online. The problem was complex. Airlines wanted updates immediately; an updated CDROM every 90 days was not sufficient. Large data transmissions were tedious and error prone. All the client reader solutions required that customers buy and install certain hardware and software.

When http and the Mosaic browser appeared, I instantly saw in it solutions to many of these problems. What’s more, the more I looked at the potential capabilities, the more I saw of possibilities for solving other problems that I had familiarity with. The list seemed to be endless.

At that time, the official word on the web from all of my management was that it was just a fad and would never be a company standard. Somewhere in the archives of the Boeing Commercial Airplane Company is a request form with my name listed as the petitioner recommending that http and the web browser (Mosaic was the only one at that time) be adopted as an architectural standard. Attached to it is a copy of my long list of potential applications / problems we could solve using it. That list had been forwarded around the company so much that today, it would certinly be caught by a spam filter for all to fwds in the subject line.

Resistance to such a vision seems like nonsense now, but at the time, I was speaking heresy. And i was speaking it anyone and everyone that would listen.


A colleague chided me saying “To the man with a hammer, everything looks like a nail”. He was right. And now, after nearly two decades of the World Wide Web, it is plainly evident that everything was in fact, a nail.

I saw the future corectly; even my outlandish vision was a gross underestimation.  My only regret is that I was in an ill position to capitalize on it properly. I didn’t start or join a dot.com and I struggled to find a niche among others who shared the same vision.  As the sci-fi stories often conclude, seeing the future and being able to do something about are two different things. I have, however, gotten a little better at it than before.

These days, I have a large box of hammers and like collecting news ones. Some I discover, others I make. Nails come in all shapes and sizes. I still spend a lot of time studying them. And I when it comes to solving problems effectively, I hit the nail on the head on a routine basis. It’s what I do.

If you have a good hammer, don’t be shy. But do study about nails.

- roger, a self-proclaimed visionary and nail hammerer

A Steve Urkel moment on Mars?

Well, it seems this week, everyone’s “favorite machine’ is a little robotic off-roadster called Curiosity. Take a look at what he sees from his little vantage point on the red planet. Yes, I am personifying this little creature. I can’t help it. Anything that travels that far to send photos to the folks back home deserves our love and affection. It is without a doubt in the Favorite Machine Hall of Fame next to Lunar Rover and Robbie the Robot.

Link to Panoramic 360` pan

Pretty spectacular. We didn’t have images anything close to this with the moon landings and there was a photographer on site to shoot it. As you pan around ponder the tracks resembling some kind of crop circle style drawing in the sand to space men (Us?) that I wonder, will it ever erode away?, and I fancy Curiosity, upon seeing it (slightly personified) has a Steve Urkle moment. “Did I do that?”

Is this personification?  Anthropomorphism?  Or is it really Steve Urkel on Mars?

- roger

Steve Urkel in Wikipedia

MyPhoneHenge at BIG(D)ESIGN

Thank you to BIG(D)ESIGN 2012 for once again being a marvelous host to my art.  What a great crowd and venue for my brand of “Tech-Expressionist” Sculpture.  And thank you to all my Kickstarter supporters.  Bless You!!  It certainly eases the pain of birthing such a large hulk of metallic media innovation.

Following Big D, this work is going to the Gravity Centre Dallas to adorn the space of creatives. Now, I’ll be looking for others who would like something like this or MyFavoriteMachine to inhabit their offices.  Its an awesome conversation-starter, especially if your business is design-related, really especially if it is about mobile design!

- roger

More photos below. You can also see these as a Slideshow on Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/belveal/sets/72157629935295106/show/